Taiwan's trade negotiators moved quickly on May 8 to contain expectations after a U.S. federal court struck down another of the Trump administration's tariff measures, clarifying that the ruling offers no immediate relief for Taiwanese exporters and that Taipei remains focused on a separate — and potentially more consequential — set of U.S. trade investigations.
What the Court Actually Decided
On May 7, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled 2–1 that the Trump administration had unlawfully imposed a blanket 10% temporary tariff by invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The court found that citing a "balance-of-payments deficit" as justification failed to meet the statutory threshold that provision requires.
The Section 122 measure had been introduced as a workaround after the U.S. Supreme Court dealt the administration a more significant blow on February 20, ruling 6–3 that an earlier wave of reciprocal tariffs — levied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — exceeded the law's authority and violated the constitutional separation of powers.
Why the Ruling Doesn't Help Taiwan Broadly
Taiwan's Executive Yuan Office of Trade Negotiations was careful to frame the CIT decision in limited terms. In a statement Thursday evening, the office said the ruling's legal effect extends only to the two plaintiff importers — specialty food company Burlap and Barrel and toy distributor Basic Fun — as well as the State of Washington, which had engaged in direct imports covered by the case.
The ruling does not, the office emphasized, apply to other importers or to Taiwan's overall tariff exposure under any of the other legal frameworks the Trump administration has deployed.
Taiwan's Real Focus: Parallel Section 301 Investigations
More pressing for Taiwan are two investigations launched by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in mid-March under Section 301 of the same 1974 Trade Act. The first, announced March 11, examines structural industrial overcapacity and overproduction across 16 economies — Taiwan among them. The second, announced a day later, covers the 60 largest U.S. trading partners and scrutinizes whether those economies have adequately enforced bans on goods made with forced labor.
Taiwan has been actively engaged on both fronts. The Office of Trade Negotiations said the government submitted written comments to U.S. authorities before the April 15 deadline, and sent representatives from Taiwan's de facto embassy in Washington to attend public hearings — April 28–29 for the forced-labor investigation, and May 5–8 for the overcapacity hearing. Written follow-up submissions responding to points raised at both hearings are also being prepared.
Taiwan Aims to Lock In Gains From ART Negotiations
Looking ahead, the office said U.S. authorities are expected to schedule bilateral consultation meetings at which investigated economies can present their positions directly. Taiwan will send representatives to participate.
The overarching objective, the office stated, is to ensure that the Section 301 investigation outcomes fully reflect the progress already secured under Taiwan-U.S. Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) negotiations — and to protect Taiwan's national and industrial interests from being rolled back by the probe's conclusions.
No timeline was given for when the investigations are expected to conclude or when the consultation meetings would be scheduled.
More from The Storm Media:
（Related：
Taiwan Paid the Highest Price in Trump's Tariff War — and Got Nothing in Return
｜
Latest
）
