Yusuke Anami (阿南友亮) is a professor at Tohoku University's Graduate School of Law, born in 1972, and holds a doctorate from Keio University's Graduate School of Law. His research focuses on Chinese politics and diplomacy. He is the author of《中国はなぜ軍拡を続けるのか》(Why China Continues to Expand Its Military), which received the 40th Suntory Prize for Social Sciences and Humanities and a special award at the 30th Asia Pacific Prize. He is widely regarded as a leading empirical scholar of contemporary China.
Anami spoke with Storm Media in an exclusive interview, drawing on his years of research into the People's Liberation Army to assess the evolving situation in the Taiwan Strait, the shifting dynamics of military governance under Xi Jinping, and the expectations many in Taiwanese society hold that Japan would come to Taiwan's defense in a crisis.
(Related:
Exclusive | The Iran Strikes Bought Taiwan Time. A Japanese General Says Use It
|
Latest
)

Japan Accepts the Logic of Taiwan's Crisis. Dying for It Is Another Matter.
Anami notes that in the 2025 Liberal Democratic Party leadership election, Sanae Takaichi (高市早苗) won considerable support. He reads this as evidence that the concept promoted by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe — that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” — has gradually become a baseline consensus in Japanese security policy.
Should China's current pressure continue, Anami argues, Japan will move more formally toward strengthening its defense capabilities. But standing in the way is the constraint of Japan's constitution. Under current security legislation, Japan may exercise collective self-defense jointly with the United States — but the legal and political conditions for Japan to intervene independently in a Taiwan contingency, without U.S. involvement, do not yet exist.
For Taiwan, Anami says, playing the “Japan card” unilaterally is extremely difficult. The Japan Self-Defense Forces would participate in a Taiwan contingency only in support of U.S. forces, and only after Washington had effectively forced Tokyo to choose between joining the operation or risking the alliance itself.
He understands the emotional expectations many Taiwanese hold toward Japan, but is direct about the reality: Japan's involvement in any Taiwan scenario remains inseparable from the U.S.-Japan alliance framework. An independent Japanese intervention is, for now, essentially inconceivable.
At the same time, Anami notes that if Takaichi — who presents herself as heir to the Abe line — achieves a historic result in the 2026 lower house elections, it would reflect the depth of security anxiety China has generated in Japan, and could not rule out downstream effects on past diplomatic policies and legal frameworks.
Japan's postwar pacifism remains deeply rooted, Anami observes, but public consciousness is shifting toward a realism that acknowledges the previously unthinkable can happen — driven by the war in Ukraine and China's coercive attempts to alter the status quo by force.
Japanese society harbors no ambition to recolonize Taiwan, he says, but building consensus around shedding blood for another country will take time. Those who argue a Taiwan contingency has nothing to do with Japan are becoming a minority. Behind this unstable international environment, Anami adds, China is experiencing internal power shifts of a magnitude comparable to the 1971 Lin Biao incident.

















































