The recent move of a senior Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) executive to Intel has reignited debate over whether talent transfers can narrow the gap between the world's leading foundry and its American rival. A former TSMC research director, however, argues that technology alone is not the deciding factor—corporate culture is.
Speaking on Storm Media's program International"Fly to the World",Yang Kuang-lei(楊光磊), a former research and development director at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), said Intel faces deep structural challenges in trying to replicate TSMC's foundry model.
“Even if the technology were transferred in full, the culture cannot be transferred,” Yang said, adding that Intel remains years away from matching TSMC's execution capability.
(Related:
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Signals Bold Expansion in Taiwan: "The More Headquarters, the Better"
|
Latest
)

Technology Can Move—Culture Cannot
The comments follow controversy surrounding Lo Wei-jen(羅唯仁), a former senior vice president at TSMC who allegedly accessed sensitive data related to advanced process technologies—including next-generation nodes—before leaving the company for Intel in late 2025. The incident raised concerns that proprietary knowledge could accelerate Intel's foundry ambitions.
Yang dismissed that assumption as misguided.
Drawing on his own experience as a former consultant to Intel, Yang described fundamental differences in organizational alignment between the two companies. He compared TSMC to a system in which “360 people may differ by only one degree, but all move in the same direction.” Intel, by contrast, he said, operates in a far more fragmented environment, where “360 people each point in different directions, resulting in zero net movement.”
According to Yang, this lack of alignment reflects a broader cultural problem rather than a technical one.











































